ECOSYSTEM SERVICES - ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF CONCEPT

Authors

  • L. Arkhypova Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
  • M. Prykhodko Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31471/2415-3184-2019-2(20)-24-32

Keywords:

key terms, ecosystem services, classification, evaluation

Abstract

In Ukraine, the topic of ecosystem services is new, and the definition of ecosystem services remains largely debatable. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of international and domestic experience in the definition of "ecosystem services" in order to further regulate the regulatory environment, to substantiate complex methods and systematic practices of economic assessment of ecosystem services.

According to the existing ecosystem services classification proposed in the UN Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Program (2005), services provided by ecosystems can fall into one of four broad categories, which to some extent coincide with the functions of natural capital and include: providing, regulating and cultural services that directly affect people, and support services necessary to preserve other services. " The definitions used in the scientific literature to characterize particular aspects of ecosystem services, in particular ecosystem processes, ecosystem functions, ecosystem services, benefits, and investments in ecosystem services, are discussed in the article. The scheme of conceptual relations between key terms is presented.

As a result of the analysis of the literature, acceptable principles for the evaluation of ecosystem services and the classification of ecosystem services are substantiated. Ecosystem services include: providing services, that is, benefits that ecosystems provide (food, fresh water, wood, genetic resources, biochemical compounds, etc.); regulatory services, that is, benefits derived from the regulation of ecosystem processes (eg climate regulation, water management, water treatment, etc.); cultural services, ie intangible benefits that people receive from ecosystems (spiritual and religious, aesthetic, educational services, recreation and ecotourism, cultural heritage, etc.); as well as the support services required to preserve and operate all other ecosystem services (eg soil formation, nutrient cycling, photosynthesis, water cycle).

Research findings can be used to scientifically justify assessments of ecosystem services in Ukraine with a view to further implementing European environmental law.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.United Nations Environment Assembly of the United Nations Environment Programme [Електронний ресурс] / UNEP/EA.3/25. Distr.: General, 15 October 2017. – Режим доступу : http://wedocs.unep.org/ bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/22251/k1708347e.pdf?seq uence=2&isAllowed=y).
2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 2005. – [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
3. Павлов Д.С., Букварева Е.Н. Биоразнообразие, экосистемные функции и жизнеобеспечение человечества. – [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://macroevolution.narod.ru/bukv1.doc
4 Haines-Young R. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure [Електронний ресурс] / Haines-Young R., Potschin M.B. – Nottingham, 2017. – Режим доступу : //https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/lg23_cices_v5. 1_final_revised_guidance_03-10-2017.pdf
5. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Interim report, - 2013, - [електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/pdf/EU%20Valuation.pdf
6. Mandryk, O. M., Arkhypova, L. M., Pukish, A. V., Zelmanovych, A. and Yakovlyuk, Kh., 2016. Theoretical and methodological foundations of sustainable development of Geosystems IOP Publishing. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. International Conference on Innovative Ideas in Science (IIS2016) 10–11 November, Baia Mare, Romania. International databases Web of science, volume 200(2017) 012018. [online]. Available at: <http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757899X/200/1/012018> [Acce¬ssed 11 September 2017].
7. Arkhypova, L. M. (2014a). Hranychna mistkist ta stalyi rozvytok rekreatsiinoi zony "Bukovel". Ekolohichna bezpeka ta zbalansovane resursokorystuvannia: naukovo-tekhnichnyi zhurnal, 2(10), 93–100. Ivano-Frankivsk: Symfoniia forte. [in Ukrainian].
8. Kinash, I. P., Arkhypova, L. M., Polyanska, A. S., Dzoba, O. G., Andrusiv, U. Y., & Iuras, I. I. (2019). Economic evaluation of tourism infrastructure development in Ukraine. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, , 477(1)
9. Korchemlyuk, M. V. and Arkhypova, L. M., 2016. Environmental audit of Ukrainian basin ecosystem of the Prut river. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5(155), pp. 98‒106. Available at: <http://nv.nmu.org.ua/index.php/uk/arkhiv-zhurnalu/za-vipuskami/1334-2016/zmist-5-2016> [Accessed 7 April 2017].
10. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 [електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/5th%20MAES%20report.pdf

Published

2020-02-22

How to Cite

Arkhypova, L., & Prykhodko, M. (2020). ECOSYSTEM SERVICES - ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF CONCEPT. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, (19(2), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.31471/2415-3184-2019-2(20)-24-32

Issue

Section

ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION